human rights:

As I have dealt with this subject very extensively in my  book "Roots of Law", I simply copy-in its first and second chapters.


I.L.0.0 BASIC RIGHTS are inherent and life-long and not subject to any interference, including even unanimous opposing vote, by anyone else [which is why unbridled democracy is as perverted and evil as is dictatorship].

I.L.0.1 BASIC RIGHTS are international in nature and are the responsibility of one person to any other person irrespective of nationality [and irrespective of species].

I.L.0.2 BASIC RIGHTS are applied to all those who have in their natures the ability to “ask” for them: all communicating beings [that have at least a central nervous system and also a brain of one level or another].

I.L.0.3 BASIC “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Rights” are [for all creatures with a cerebral cortex, as a minimum category]:

LIFE, FREE WILL, and the free availability of non-superfluous:




I.L.0.3.4 Access to all known INFORMATION & EDUCATION.



I.L.0.3.7 TRAVEL & TRANSIT [& “Sightseeing”].



What one receives from nature can never be lost, or sold, or even be subject to anyone’s vote: even if you wished to lose them, you could not do so since they are not really “yours” to begin with – you didn’t create them yourself – and so not able to be disposed of as you please; these are thusly termed “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Rights” [and are in contrast to “Individual Created PROPORTIONAL Rights” whereby the degree of one’s ownership or priority is the proportion that he himself created of the item in question]. One corollary of the non-saleability of BASIC “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Rights” is the set of fundamental economic principles of V.L.0.0, which in abbreviated form reads:

All debt understood to refer to the principal within one percent [1%] of original purchasing power.

Only secured or involuntary debt is legally enforceable in court [except as in FEP Note].

Only transitory debt is legally enforceable in court [except as in FEP Note].

Collection time duration on debt is one year plus thirty-five days, and NO debt is enforceable to pay some other debt [no roll-overs, etc.].

This inability to be lost or sold or voted upon applies to:

I.X.0.1 LIFE [and so no intentional killing – moreover, this is also established from the “non-equivalentation principle” whereby the infinite (∞) of life can never be equaled by the non-infinite of human decision-making].

I.X.0.2 FREE WILL [and so no slavery in any form – which is also linked to the fundamental economic principles].



I.X.0.5 MEDICINE & HEALTH CARE [Society, to convenience itself and to impose its choice of a living environment, has destroyed most natural medicine sources like herbs and mineral springs, etc., and itself has created most of the causes of modern illness with its pollution and its forced localized congestion and its traffic accidents, etc.; plus there is also the element of the knowledge for health care being in the main a multi-input natural communal by-product].

I.X.0.6 Access to all known INFORMATION and EDUCATION [Education is another – like society’s health care knowledge and ability – natural by-product of social interrelationship and of the multiplicity of input (from earliest language originators to today’s researchers, writers, broadcasters, etc.) which is inherent in all human knowledge so that any individual proportionality claim thereto being enormously less than one part in a million. Knowledge is the patrimony of all humanity (it is ridiculous for some man or company to refuse to share recent discoveries with others when it could well have been the grandparent of these others who was the one who had freely made available to all some crucial knowledge which made this recent discovery possible in the first place) – and even the patrimony of non-humans due to the many lives and sufferings and inconveniences that other creatures have unwillingly and unjustly endured so that man could increase that common fund of knowledge. This patrimony is by RIGHT and is so fully apart from considerations of the moral and social values and benefits that flow from such information dissemination; claims on recent advances of knowledge for monetary reward or for acclaim or for first-option-at-use are an altogether different matter from restriction – whether outright or via inconvenient availability on dissemination of that knowledge, or from blanket refusal to teach any item from this common fund of knowledge to all who might want it; especially, they are different from outright obstruction of any individual from obtaining any item of knowledge he desires since that is his RIGHT from the inheritance of humanity and by virtue of being a reasoning creature. It should also be pointed out that this INFORMATION/EDUCATION/KNOWLEDGE RIGHT – the three terms are essentially interchangeable – does not mean that you have to make a special point of showing a suicidal person how to make poison or to help develop a weapon to injure people, because the reasoned restraint of one’s own actions is quite different from a deliberate blocking by concrete actions or from collusive efforts to collectively neither teach nor disseminate nor even simply make readily available some item of knowledge].

I.X.0.7.0 JOB and UNHINDERED INTER-COMMUNICATION [A job right is a variation on the knowledge right of social inter-relationship and ancestral mutual contribution, and is part of one’s right to inter-communicate (here: to interact with one’s society). A person by birth on this planet would normally be having access to free gathering of food, water, shelter, plant fibers, minerals, land, etc.; so when he is born into a social set-up which has replaced free-flowing rivers and natural forests and shrubs and tall grasses with dams and pavement and gardens and lawns and pulp-producing artificially homogeneous timber stands, etc., then that society has obligated itself in an understood social contract to replace the missing natural mode of survival – gathering, fishing, etc. – with alternate modes: jobs. When society defaults on provision of jobs, and especially on provision of jobs that are non-oppressive (attractive, fulfilling and enriching or rewarding), then the individual can consider the social contract as voided and commence attempts to reclaim his natural survival mode: tear up pavement, break down dams, ignore zoning procedures, etc. When society provides jobs, even artificial jobs (but deemed by user – by accepting it other than just having a support payment and studying some field of knowledge – as sufficiently beneficial for providing the required social interaction) or straight no-job support payments, it is not being in any sense “generous” (especially if they are for minimal living standards), but is simply fulfilling that social contract by which it remains free to keep intact its golf courses, traffic-regulation authority, dam and coal/oil energy-production authority, etc..

I.X.0.7.1 UNHINDERED means, besides NO group membership taxes nor payroll taxes (except, of course, as sales taxes at the standard level for each individual payment for service or “sale” – but no tax to be on the overall payroll) nor any similar type of group tax, that there can be NO exceptions to any desired inter-communication/action except those listed in CHAPTER II’s twelve (12) “Non-interference Exception Categories”. Even to erroneously yell “fire” in a crowded enclosure or to lie or to advocate violent overthrow and subversion of any institution or any government, etc. are all protected rights. Since the so-called “cut-off point” of what is and is not a justifiable intrusion to a BASIC RIGHT is not determinable (and least of all so by mass action, i.e., vote) and since more danger is incurred by intruding (even on a theoretical basis) into such areas than is incurred by allowing any outlandish interpretation of these rights to freely proceed, then society must handle any possible abuses by means of extra effort in response rather than simple intrusive interdiction. Examples of avenues of collective social action to handle disruptive (but not as yet physically damaging ) expression would be the using of special lighting and easy access in crowded enclosures, and using special crowd and fire control techniques, and using spotlights to identify disturbers of harmony who in the future may simply be denied entry if it is a private edifice or – for a public one – be provided special escort or positioning, etc. The basic point is that one has the right to be free from interference only in a physical sense (though it should also be emphasized that wave power is also a physical force and especially so when it reaches certain durations or levels of frequency, etc.) and, if someone else wishes to use a distorted sense of reality – and each person is indeed different as to what is a value to him and it is no one else’s business to try to set his standards for him – to communicate to you some nonsense, or a lie, or whatever, then that is his natural right to do, and your response is simply to look to your own sense of morality and intellectual honesty and respond to him or ignore him or walk away from him as you see fit. In conclusion of this section, it should also be pointed out that while saying such a thing as that you want to institute the death penalty, or want to kill some one, etc., is a legitimate natural right of free expression, when it is taken to the point of physical implementation – such as a legislator voting for funds to implement the premeditated killing of anyone whether as “death penalty” or in war or under any other circumstance – then that is a major violation of the law and is prosecutable by anyone to a Grand Jury].

I.X.0.8.0 LAND and SHELTER [As another corollary to never being able to lose a BASIC “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Right”, there is the reality that clearly LAND and any home SHELTER upon it can never be subjected to any sort of tax or fee since, even if one never paid it, one could never lose the land or home or be deprived of their use in any way.

I.X.0.8.1 Likewise, since – while one can exchange equal lands to move one’s residence – one can never even sell one’s BASIC LAND RIGHT, then all those holding/hoarding more than equal share of land (determined as per the given cultural unity area – “nation” – involved) do so illegally and are traffickers in stolen goods.

I.X.0.8.2 Land rights are a bit more complicated than most other rights due to varying availability, quality, cultural priorities, other species’ rights, and some crossing from the category of “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Rights” – the right, at a minimum, to own a place to live upon – into the second category of “Individual Created PROPORTIONAL Rights” whereby the degree of one’s ownership or priority is the proportion he himself created of the item in question (such as some upgrading of public land that one may have leased from the community by actions that improved soil fertility and reduced disease and toxic chemical presence and increased diversity of plant species, etc.).

I.X.0.8.3 The first principle to note on land is that other species are entitled to their un-humanized portion and a good case can be made for this to be decided at over ninety percent (90%) of the total (the case derives from the very number of such species) and certainly at least at two-thirds (2/3) of the total; however, with man’s remaining hardness of heart, there will only be insistence on a minimum setting aside of one-third (1/3) of the total world area, and involving a representative one-third (1/3) of the area of every recognizable eco-system – the exact delineation for which can be left to a future analysis.

I.X.0.8.4 Of the remaining two-thirds (2/3) of the land, each person is entitled to own at least enough land upon which to reside (build a home upon); this would probably be about a quarter () hectare (depending upon where in the world – in which country –one lives) per person, and with the actual size varying (apart from by consideration of what nation you are dealing with) by the quality of the particular piece of land in question, and it would not be all in one spot; could allot, say .08 acres (about 0.35 hectares) as the primary residence zone base home allotment and two units at 0.20 acres (about 0.08 hectares) each as secondary auxiliary residence allotments (with one possibly located in an agricultural zone) and finally another 0.2 acres (about 0.08 hectares) as his required commercial zone allotment.

I.X.0.8.5 The tentative initial assignment of land coming at age twelve (12), but with finalized permanent registry coming at age twenty-four (24).

I.X.0.8.6 Another major principle balances tendency for community cooperation against that for rupture/fission. In the enactment of the concept of initial equal land division, everyone could insist upon an exact equal division of ALL of the community land between all of the residents living there, but then we would be back to the principles of the earliest natural gathering societies and many of their resultant problems such as no agreed transit routes and unregulated land allotment for future population growth, etc.; especially the employment of stark total equal division of ALL available land (not already allotted to other species) would entail everyone’s facing major changes in almost all present societal functions and not many would want that to happen – those who do so insist (or those who wish to live according to a different nomocracy document) can be satisfied by setting aside a proportion of the land which matches those dissenters’ numbers and then expelling them to it (another example of natural fission) while withdrawing that area from all the mainstream society’s benefits; those not requiring such societal rupture could then proceed to allot to each individual the untaxable and unsaleable ownership of enough land upon which to build a home.

I.X.0.8.7 Changes of residence are effected via equal swaps of allotments, etc..

I.X.0.8.8 Long-term lease allowable as long as it is conditioned upon the owner’s ultimate right to reclaim it free-of-charge at any time – since he can never be required to pay any sort of fee or any other consideration in order to reclaim his designated primary base home residence allotment or commercial allotment (but secondary auxiliary residence plots are different) – and so any lessee had best have various trust deposits set aside by the leaser for compensation due to early or hasty eviction which can indeed happen to someone not the land’s designated and publicly registered owner/leaser.

I.X.0.8.9 The final principle relating to land involves use of the word community which is critical to analyzing proper procedure on land distribution due to the fact that it is neither practical nor ethical to divide all the world’s land by all of the world’s people – and, of course, after first subtracting that one-third (1/3) belonging to the other species; for one reason, societies have differed in various parts of the world in what they consider to be appropriate population densities for their respective areas; in the Netherlands a high population density was considered acceptable in order to maintain land reclamation projects and to run a high industry-proportioned and high export-oriented economy and to retain territorial integrity; in Sweden a lower population density was preferred for other reasons; accordingly, an individual’s land claim size should be based upon that community sense of “social contract” into which he was born and grew up (this also being the rationale for setting up special State areas for residence allotments of below standard size for families which exceed the offspring quota national average – those people have, in effect, chosen for themselves a more dense community standard); there are many ways one could choose to delineate a community, but the most logical and practical one is that of the present-day nation unit. Actually, even this will require some modification due to the effects caused by putting off for so long of the allotment of appropriate land blocks for other species; as a consequence of this delay – and which situation worsens with the increase in the delay – certain smaller sized countries may need to be nearly or totally eliminated (as of the 2000 date of this analysis); however, for almost all such situations, the population densities – and even the cultures – of the surrounding areas into which these people must be evacuated are very similar to the original areas from which they will be moved, and so just modest good will, combined with full compensation (for assets lost and for inconvenience endured), should be all that is required to arrive at a fair and mutually acceptable resolution].

I.X.0.9 Finally, this inability to be lost or sold or voted upon applies to TRAVEL and TRANSIT – and even to “Sightseeing” RIGHTS: all unloseable BASIC “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Rights”, that are not subject to anyone else’s interference or even vote [of course, society may vote on the best way of facilitating for itself the implementation of various aspects of these RIGHTS, but it always bears the burden of accommodating the individual in these RIGHTS and not vice-versa; for example, if society wishes to employ passports in travel matters, then it is up to it to arrange a convenient means of providing each individual with such a passport and not up to the individual to figure out how to get one: i.e., if the passport isn’t available, then the requirement for one ceases to exist].

I.L.1.0 TAXES – Understood Via Rights.

Early in the EXTENSION & UNDERSTANDING section, reference was made to how economics are effected by, and in turn effect, the principles underlying all RIGHTS; since economic devices are often insidiously employed to undermine RIGHTS, it is hereby specified what constitute legitimate “taxes” of whatever form or name [and repeated in briefer form in CHAPTER II, “Non-interference Exception Category” number ten (10)].

I.L.1.1 A tax may never be placed upon what one does as a natural part of living on one’s own or as a family, and so no such things as residence taxes or property taxes, nor livelihood taxes or an overall payroll tax [unit item sales tax for this was explained earlier at I.X.0.7.1], nor income taxes, nor inheritance taxes; but can have taxes as costs or fees for any surpluses [i.e. BNCAR costs guaranteed to be covered before all other considerations] to BASIC RIGHTS that one receives from others or from society.

I.L.1.2.0 Legitimate taxes are as follows.

I.L.1.2.1 “Fine taxes” for damages or inefficiencies that one imposes upon society [accident costs, environmental disruption fees, law violation fines, etc. – assuming that one agrees that they are preferable to exile].

I.L.1.2.2 “Public domain exploitation taxes” for receiving priority use of public property such as agricultural land [auction leases] and natural resources [concentrated mineral exploitation, etc.].

I.L.1.2.3 “Usage fee taxes” for use of special interest facilities that are provided by society the same as if they were provided by another individual; for example, the use of such man-made structures as bridges and museums [although best to limit fee charging to only special exhibit occasions], and the use of governmental testing facilities for obtaining eventual listing at a certain level of accomplishment as pilot or as a driver or as some other professional expert; however, no fee may be demanded nor license required in order to be free to engage in any sort of activity since that would violate BASIC RIGHTS, and so the issuing of licenses is something that would never occur: only voluntary registration as having taken tests and what those tests indicate [a quality verification form of Underwriters’ Laboratory listing].

In addition to these obvious one-to-one taxes, there is also the fact that there exists a certain indistinct area of costs and services that can only be evaluated on a statistical basis; when a commercial transaction occurs, a significant part of its ability to be concluded is due to the fact that an infra-structure of facilities has been provided to it by the society as a whole, and this is true both for the individual transaction [or “sale”] on a local facilities basis and for the overall volume [or “gross”] on a national total facilities basis [total facilities: material, knowledge, personnel pool, organization & regulation, security, communication, etc.]. Thus there can be:

I.L.1.2.4 “Sales taxes” for individual unit commercial transactions.

I.L.1.2.5 “Societal percent ownership taxes” as a percentage of ownership of the enterprise [whether a corporation or just an individual business] by society [i.e. the Government] due to the overall volume of total sales.

I.L.1.3 What is most important here is that these taxes be non-arbitrary and proportioned to all products and enterprises in a totally equal manner. Accordingly, “sales taxes” are to be kept essentially [but not exclusively] to the category of value added taxes [VAT] and they are to be uniform for all items, or at least uniform per given cost level [say, the first ten (10) euros of a sale to be taxed at zero percent (0%), and from then to one hundred (100) euros at five percent (5%), and from one hundred (100) to one thousand (1000) euros at ten percent (10%), then perhaps the second (2nd) thousand (1,000) up to the tenth (10th) thousand (1,000) to be taxed at twenty percent (20%), or something similar – that is the most arbitrariness that can be morally and legally allowed].

I.L.1.4 The “societal percent ownership taxes” are to have a zero percent [0%] societal ownership of an enterprise below a given large level of gross and to have a maximum of sixty percent [60%] – with the actual figures dependent upon the size of the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare [ISEW] of the nation in question [for a one trillion (1012) euro ISEW, the actual figures are to be zero percent (0%) societal ownership for enterprises of less than one million (106) euros of yearly gross sales, one percent (1%) for €1M (million) to €5M, then an increase of one percent (1%) for each €5M increase of the gross sales until it reaches twenty percent (20%) societal ownership for a €100M yearly gross, then an increase of one percent (1%) for each €10M increase of gross until it reaches thirty percent (30%) societal ownership for a €200M yearly gross, then an increase of one percent (1%) for each €30M increase of gross until it reaches forty percent (40%) societal ownership for a €500M yearly gross, then an increase of one percent (1%) for each €100M increase of gross until it reaches fifty percent (50%) societal ownership of a €1.5B (billion) yearly gross, and then no increase until over €2B of yearly gross sales, at which point societal ownership reaches its maximum allowed total of sixty percent (60%) – these figures all for a Euro 1T (trillion) ISEW economy, so that for a 5T economy, multiply by 5, and for a 100B economy, divide the yearly gross sales figures by 10, etc.]. If society [Government] believes that it must for some reason own say forty percent [40%] of the largest grosser in every field or some specialty fields and it happens that the largest does not come according to the chart figures to a forty percent [40%] societal share of total ownership, then the society could achieve that forty percent [40%] figure by public market bid and purchase of the remaining required percentage [say, an additional twelve percent (12%) to go with the twenty-eight percent (28%) it already owned due to the enterprise’s sales volume and that it thus didn’t have to purchase from the enterprise or from the public as it had to do for the twelve percent (12%)].

I.L.1.5 Since historically much manipulation goes on in these areas of commerce, the following additional clarifications are specified:

to be considered as a single enterprise [for purposes of calculation of gross and thus the “societal percent ownership taxes”] are to be all those enterprises which have even one board member or administrative executive who serves in one of those roles in each of the enterprises; if any one of the three largest non-Government shareholders owns a part of any other enterprise, then the smaller gross will be added in the proportion owned by the shareholder(s) to the larger gross for purposes of calculation of the larger enterprise’s yearly gross sales figures [thus, if two (2) of the three (3) largest non-Government shareholders of an enterprise which has a 2B gross own ten percent (10%) of another enterprise which has a 1B gross, then ten percent (10%) of the 1B will be added to the calculated 2B gross of the larger of the two enterprises and so making the new figure – for “societal percent ownership tax” purposes only – for gross yearly sales for that enterprise as being 2.1B]; the terms “board member” and “administrative executive” usually have rather clear meanings, but should the Commerce Department administrator in charge in this area believe that the spirit of these definitions is being abused and decide that a broader definition in certain specific instances is warranted, then he can take his case to a Grand Jury [composed one-third (1/3) of random population, one-third (1/3) of random population with I.Q. of 140 or higher, and one-third (1/3) of former university post-graduates or those with such a level of education – see CHAPTER VIII].

I.L.1.6 It should be noted that while the State usually obtains its percent ownership share of an enterprise without making any direct payments for it since it is a form of sales tax on large enterprises [for reasons given earlier], nevertheless, besides receiving its profit share while it owns part of the enterprise, it also receives cash payment in the event it has to sell part of its percent ownership due to that enterprise’s loss of gross sales – and which procedure also means that there is a penalty to State managers due to poor performance on gross sales, and also due to loss of profitability [at least as to the fact of net profit or loss, since the degree of profit is often automatically limited by the need to guarantee a job to everyone, and with the State-owned areas of enterprise naturally being the first line of utilization to meet that end, although by no means the only one: bonuses and etc. for private retraining and so forth] since a State-majority-owned enterprise would not be allowed to go over four [4] years without showing a net profit, after which time it would have to sell off assets to cover any losses that had accumulated [and so reducing its gross sales upon which its percent ownership depends (except if it is weaponry aided by the State – see CHAPTER V) and so reversing part of the process of acquisition].

I.L.1.7 It can be seen in all of these matters that an uppermost consideration has been a strict adherence to only those actions that can be justified by full observance of the BASIC RIGHTS of everyone: both as an individual dealing with a large society, and from society’s standpoint dealing with its various members and components. Thus, as pointed out earlier, society has a right to levy certain sales type of taxes [“VAT” on individual sales and “societal percentage ownership” on the larger category of gross sales] as its rightful “commission” for helping to arrange and even to create [from past & present inputs from society-at-large] these productive activities, and thereby enabling the transactions to be made in the first place [through its organization, energy distribution, transportation regulation, monitoring of sales of new creations for proper originator compensation, facilitating the coming together of user and producer and of patient and doctor and of student and teacher, its input of a common fund of knowledge and of a personnel pool, its provision of security and insurance and reliability and dispute resolution, etc.], and also a right to levy certain fine and exploitation and usage type taxes. Especially in those indistinct areas that try to properly relate costs [taxes] with services, it can be seen that a balance exists between the areas of indistinct costs [taxes levied on a statistical basis (of the most probable proportion of input value made to the individual or enterprise by the society-at-large, and so legitimizing a charge) – even if not every charge-for-value input can be clearly traced] and between the areas of indistinct services [health care, shelter, food, education, etc., where often one cannot pinpoint exactly how much of that which is provided is above or below the BASIC RIGHTS level and therefore something that has, or has not, already been inherently “paid for” by the individual]. Clearly, the level of taxes and services will change over time as requirements are perceived in different lights; but what should NEVER change are the areas in which intrusion by taxes and services are permitted and required; and also never to change is the non-subjective uniform implementation of the taxes and services.

I.L.2.0 INDIVIDUALS INCLUDED [Cerebral Cortexes] – And Their Degree.

I.L.2.1 Regarding applying BASIC RIGHTS to all creatures with a cerebral cortex [as a minimum category], this minimum category is as of 2000 to include, besides Homo sapiens sapiens, also whales, dolphins, porpoises, great apes & baboons, elephants, & raccoons [for all of whom any act against one of them shall under law be treated as a similar act against Homo sapiens sapiens (working with or viewing or etc. one of them shall thus have to be on the basis of preference of the individual animal in question and thus with provision to them of non-participating alternatives of a natural native condition)].

I.L.2.2 Regarding all other mammals as well as marsupials, birds, octopi, and (tortoises and turtles), any act of major interference and stress, or of any physical harm, or especially of killing shall be treated as a major law violation [so-called “felony crime”], but not of the same level as for Homo sapiens sapiens, whales, dolphins, porpoises, great apes & baboons, elephants, and raccoons.

I.L.2.3 Regarding the 2.2 category [Levels II, III, IV – see VIII.L.18.5.1] creatures, there may be permitted the circumstance that special “Rights Respecting Controlled Environments” may be imposed upon some members of these species for purposes of closer interaction with man, such as viewing, riding, testing, feather collection, hair shearing, fluid collection, etc.; additionally, under very limited circumstances [akin to their natural environment] and contrary to the primary recommendation of trying harder to relieve the suffering, they may [as of 2000] be killed in as painless and considerate a manner as is possible [the circumstances required to allow such killing are: A. for non-domestic & domestic living environments for Levels II, III, IV:

          1. near natural death either by both age and present negative conditions, or by special negative circumstance that is non-subjectively determined, and able to be scientifically proven by exploratory surgery, X-ray, etc.; or

          2. effectively (for that species) permanently immobile; or

          3. in a pain that is great and that can neither be cured nor reduced by standard means such as common drugs, or sleep-inducing techniques, or locally available surgery, etc;

          B. for domestic living environment for Levels III and IV:

          1. are past age of natural death in the wild;

          2. have been provided healthy and non-crowded (no stress due to crowding) living environment for last half (and, preferably, entire) of life-time;

          3. for Level III only, have posted public notice for thirty (30) days offering transfer of ownership/responsibility to anyone agreeing to accept the animal(s) and provide at least one additional full year of healthy & non-crowded care].

I.L.2.4 For all remaining brained and blooded creatures such as amphibians, fish, reptiles, etc., they are to be treated with respect and maximum allowable non-interference, but may be killed without penalty of law – although any acts of cruelty, or wanton non-consumptive or non-utilizing killing shall also be law violations, but of a middle to low classification [so-called “misdemeanors”].


By free availability is meant: for Homo sapiens sapiens, that society guarantees provision [the item itself or the funds and immediate access to get it], or else society and its laws are said to be terminated; for non-Homo sapiens sapiens, that there will be provided all required natural living environments, with that being at least one-third of the total land area of all habitat categories [for sea creatures, one-third of the sea-bed area and above], and also that there will be no unwanted interference in their lives by man within these areas.

I.L.4 SUPERFLUOUS; Individual Created PROPORTIONAL Rights.

Superfluous means not essential for supporting a healthy and progressing life-style regarding LIFE and FREE WILL and each of the seven other listed categories of BASIC “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Rights”. Superfluous creation and availability of items falls into the category of Basic “Individual Created PROPORTIONAL Rights”– whereby the degree of one’s ownership or priority is the proportion of the item in question that he himself has created; here, too, there is to be full protection with no permitting of any interference or even subjection to vote as regards the fact of an existing ownership or priority, although votes may be required to resolve disputes as to the exact proportions of those existing ownerships or priorities – a legitimate conflict-resolving use of the voting procedure.


                                                      “INFINITY” [“LIFE” – So Never Deliberate Killing]


NON-INFINITY” [When Large Numbers of Options (Free-Willed Acts) Try to Occupy

the Same Limited-Dimensional Space/Time]

II.L.0.0 Regarding man’s physical interference with other men, and regarding what all men have a Right to be free of, the INTENTIONAL taking of human life is ALWAYS MURDER with NO EXCEPTIONS – whether regarding undelivered fetuses, or regarding war when any deaths must always be self-defensive unintentional accidents that occur in attempt to disarm or slow down, or regarding the aged or the senile or the retarded, or regarding the terminally ill and incapacitated, or regarding State law.

II.L.0.1 The only morally and legally legitimate penalty is expulsion, and with any other specified penalty always being conditioned by the option to refuse it and to accept expulsion instead.

II.L.0.2 Return of stolen items and indemnification for damage done (that does not create non-transitory debt obligations) are not really “penalties”, but merely account settlements since no new obligations are created.

II.L.0.3 The above protections of human life hereby also apply to the lives of whales, dolphins, porpoises, great apes & baboons, elephants, raccoons and ( ).

II.L.0.4 Not only are BASIC “Nature Created ABSOLUTE Rights” to be inviolate forever, but also Basic “Individual Created PROPORTIONAL Rights” are given equal protection under law; and not only is there a total freedom from having one’s life intentionally taken, but – as an especially fundamental “Non-interference Doctrine– it shall also be definite and permanent that NO law may be enacted, NOR may any individual himself act, to in any way physically interfere with, physically burden, or physically effect an individual in his person or in his ability to do as he so wishes [on his own property, in his own residence (even if he is only temporarily with priority rights thereto) or in public], and with NO exceptions by category of individual [age, health, sex, nationality, prior law violations, politics, philosophy, etc.], and with only 12 so-called “exceptions” that are to be refined by public vote.

II.L.1.0 There are twelve [12]Non-interference Doctrine Exception Categories” as follows:

II.L.1.1 Except whereby the individual himself is in violation of this very tenet [can stop that violation].

II.L.1.2 Except for the propagating of certain classes of wave & particle transmission energy [microwave, X-ray, short wave, radio wave, and so forth].

II.L.1.3 Except for regulation of special congestion [highway traffic, air traffic, street crossings, etc.].

II.L.1.4 Except for regulation of environmental pollution levels – but here any voting is not for permission to create a degree of air, water, or food pollution that can be measured to have probability [50+% possibility] of causing, now or in the estimable future, physical harm to anyone [because in that case the act is already clearly illegal by the “Non-interference Doctrine” and the requirements of the BASIC RIGHTS], but instead are only voting on the penalties for such violators, and on certain classes of pollution that are essentially just annoyances [inefficiency propagators] rather than actual dangers.

II.L.1.5 Except for zoning certain areas as to prime use category, such as areas of primary residence, areas of central commerce, areas of agriculture, areas of grazing, areas of watershed and shore land, areas of hazardous materials [radioactivity, explosives, etc.] or of hazardous degrees of concentration [oil depots, etc.], areas of parks and transit, and so forth, and the specifics of these are also to be refined by public vote AFTER the initial block areas are first set up by the Constitution [it is important that at least the general outlines of these block zone areas be incorporated in the Constitution itself, so as to avoid too much disruptive re-delineation in the future].

II.L.1.6 Except for provision of functionally required data for public activity – individual has the option to refuse the data together with the public activity [job, education, medical care, etc.].

II.L.1.7 Except for regulation of human to animal interaction since animals have public rights that must be respected according to this Constitution and by other public votes.

II.L.1.8 Except for access restrictions placed on various public lands [sanctuaries, preserves, dangerous storage areas, military areas, etc.].

II.L.1.9 Except for physically harmful actions by the individual enacted against material objects not his own, against plants, or against animals.

II.L.1.10.0 Except for taxes [and, to re-emphasize items on this, a tax may never be placed upon what one does as a natural part of living on one’s own or as a family, and so there are not to be any such things as residence or property taxes, nor livelihood or over-all payroll taxes, nor income or inheritance taxes; but can have taxes as costs or fees for any surpluses to BASIC RIGHTS that one gets from the general facilities made available to you by society; what is especially important here is that these taxes be non-arbitrary and proportioned to all products and enterprises in a totally equal manner – thus sales taxes must be uniform for all products, or at least uniform per given cost level] limited to:

a. “Sales Taxes” [chiefly VAT] for unit commercial transactions;

the VAT [value added tax] is to be at some given standard rate [5%, 12%, 17%, etc.] set by legislature.

Simple “TRANSACTION Sales Taxes” are to be at minimal rates such that:

the combination of all transaction sales taxes effecting a given item is not to total more than one-third of the rate for the VAT for said item [assuming that there is VAT assigned to said item; but, if not, then not to exceed one-third of the rate of the average of all VAT, in that given nation].

Transaction sales taxes, used when VAT doesn’t apply due to there being no clear value that is added, are to apply to EVERYTING that changes owners [even to gifts if wish recognition of legal ownership – if no sales tax paid, then no ownership change], and which includes stocks, bonds, currency “exchange”/sale [change of issuing/supporting society/agency] and all services;

for services:

1. tax only as per exchange of non-purely-intellectual items [exchange of ideas non-taxable; exchange of printout or tape containing these ideas is taxable IF #2 – existence of market equivalent price – applies, and #3 does not apply];

2. tax only applies where there is clear existence of a market created equivalent price [variables involving barter, donations, etc., may be submitted to tax board to clear up status/prices, and with automatic twenty percent [20%] minimum discounts to apply to assessments of transactions in these categories or may simply pay/file what you consider the full equivalent tax];

3. exempted from all tax are [apart from purely intellectual exchanges of knowledge, etc.] all personal type unique one-off-natured exchanges [gifts about which don’t care who is listed as owner, favors provided in emergency, single print-outs of unique combinations of data, etc.].

Payment of taxes is by purchaser to Government operating at point of use/sale [can have agreements between governments to cover split if these two – use and sale – are not at the same place, but “use point” always takes precedence over “sale point”, and “initial use point” over later use points], even if use is only to resell – in which case one determines “location” by ascertaining which legal jurisdiction is primary in enforcing the legality of the transaction;

seller is required to keep record of sales [for one year] and to collect and transfer to appropriate government all taxes that are of systematic nature [not one-off], or else all available information about any purchaser who managed not to pay the tax despite seller’s due vigilance.

b. A variety of sales tax [based upon society’s inherent shared input to any development, and upon its very special input to the ability to conduct large volumes of gross sales] called “Societal Percent Ownership Taxes” for the overall volume of commercial transactions; when an enterprise’s yearly gross sales exceed a given large figure, then there is an automatic percentage of ownership of it by society [in a Euro 1 Trillion ISEW economy, it might be zero percent (0%) below Euro 1 Million of yearly gross sales, one percent (1%) at Euro 1 Million, twenty percent (20%) at Euro 100 Million, fifty percent (50%) at Euro 1.5 Billion and to a maximum of sixty percent (60%) at over 2 Billion; for a Euro 5 Trillion ISEW economy, multiply by five (5), for a Euro 200 Billion ISEW economy, divide by five (5), etc.].

c. “Fine Taxes” for damages or inefficiencies that one imposes upon society [accident costs, environmental disruption fees, law violation fines (if agree it is better than exile), etc.].

. “Public Domain Exploitation Taxes” for receiving priority use of public property such as agricultural land [auction leases] and natural resources [concentrated mineral exploitation, etc.].

d. “Usage Fee Taxes” for certain uses of specific public man-made structural facilities of specialty interest [such as bridges, museums, testing facilities, etc.].

No medical or social security taxes are needed because everyone gets whatever he needs from the above general fund taxes, and no other public taxes or fees or licenses or certifications can be required under the Non-interference Doctrine, nor any compulsory service, nor filling out of forms or records [apart from the tax items already mentioned above, or apart from some desired item that he himself initiates], nor copyright or patent exclusivity, etc..

          1. Special fine under ORIGINATOR REGISTRATIONS/AWARDS; creator services are to be repaid by the Government, under a special program within its own Executive Department: Department of Originations, entitled ORIGINATOR REGISTRATIONS/AWARDS [which is a substitution for patents and copyrights] and with the funds for it mostly coming out of the general tax revenues, but partly also coming from penalty fines for failure to provide attribution [see below].

            Firstly, note that these ORIGINATOR REGISTRATIONS/AWARDS are only available for homo sapiens – never for an artificial legal entity such as colleges, corporations, foundations, governments, etc. [except for registry of brand and corporate/business names – see also V.L.1.5.4]; but more than one person may join together to share said ORA, and each may be assigned a different percentage of said ORA.

            These ORAs have evaluations & listings which provide:

                1. Compensation for creative ideas [excluding design and styling];

                2. Archival listings and organization of said creative ideas to facilitate use
                by [no exclusivity is allowed] other creators/developers/artists around the

                world; but note that for reproductions involving text [or measurement or

                formula – chemical or mathematical] acknowledgment [attribution] of

                creator[s] must be provided for sixteen [16] years from registration date

                or else violator will incur penalty fine [half to creators and half to Dept. of

                Originations for administration uses]; said fine will be in the following


                Per hard copy page: one MON per page up to 100 pages;

                0.1 MON per page 101 – 1000;

                0.01 MON per page 1001 – 10,000;

                0.003 MON per page above 10,000 pages.

                Per electronic copy page: all hard copy page sums multiplied by 0.01.

                The personnel performing these evaluations will be members of 4-person

                panels [assigned by lot] and each panel member's estimate will be added to the others and the sum divided by four [4].

                Said panels will consist of members with college degrees or 8-years of full-time experience within the field of study/expertise most closely related to the claim in question [Director of Dept. of Originations will make the final determination of who is available for these panels, and precisely what are the delineations between fields, and how to implement selecting panel members by lot].

                    A. Since certainty of facts is always inexact, there shall be a category of

                    Originator Recognition Percentage” that provides a summary of the analyses of claims for what traditionally have been referred to as patents or copyrights, and
                    for which summary there has been assigned a likelihood approximation of their legitimacy within three levels: 90%, 60%, 30&.

                    For a given claim, there obviously can only be one of 90%, but may have one each of 60% & 30%, and three of 30% each.

                    Originator Recognition Percentage:

                    approximately 90% likelihood of legitimacy

                    approximately 60% likelihood of legitimacy

                    approximately 30% likelihood of legitimacy

                    B. After completing part A [ORP], a different set of 4-person panels [chosen and adjusted similarly to A] will complete part B: ORIGINATOR AWARD LEVEL.

                    These “Award Levels” will be re-evaluated each year by a different panel for four [4] years following initial 'Registration”.

                    For the 1st & 4th years, the panels will consist of one graduate from each of four [4] university majors: physical sciences, engineering, social sciences, arts.

                    For the 2nd & 3rd years, all four [4] members are to have expertise within that major most closely associated with the applicant's creation.

                    What these 4-person panels will be determining [NOTE: said determination NOT subject to challenge or judicial review, except on basis of panel member(s) being bribed, blackmailed, physically threatened, or assaulted] at the
                    end of each year of the four years [from latest assembled data and from various expert evaluations inputted during each of these years] is the total sum of benefit
                    added from each of three [3] equally weighted categories:

                    1. Life/Health/Safety – of humans or of environment – estimated percentage substantial improvement over current status, which is expected during period of [nationally] eight [8] years from date of initial “Registration” and also
                    during sixteen [16] years world-wide, and with these improvement estimates ranked from 25 down to 1.

                    2. Actual projected purchases in asset value [money or barter] over eight [8] years nationally, and sixteen [16] years world-wide, and then also ranked from 25 down to 1.

                                                    3. Energy increase or efficiency time-saving [roughly  converted to energy saving – and listed as kwh] over eight [8] years nationally, and sixteen [16] years world-wide, and then also ranked from 25 down to 1.

                                                    The sum of these three categories will then be divided by three to obtain composite 25 to 1 final ranking.

                                                    At the end of the 4th year, the sum for that one year, that is determined by said 4th year panel [that is, without any averaging with previous three years] to be the best approximation of what is to be obtained by said creation over these eight [8] and sixteen [16] year periods, will be the final setting of the Part B “Originator Award Level” – UNLESS the involved creator had agreed years earlier to accept as final the sum set by the averaging of the first two [2] or three [3] yearly
            4-person panels; in which case said registered creator can claim that sum and so

            save much future years' clerical work; but, once a year's panel determined sum is
            not accepted as the final determination of future [8 year or 16 year] sum of
             benefit, then it is permanently unavailable.

                                                                                          Originator Award Levels:

                                                                                          1 25,000,000 13 200,000

                                                                                          2 15,000,000 14 150,000

                                                                                          3 10,000,000 15 100,000

                                                                                          4 7,500,000 16 75,000

                                                                                          5 5,000,000 17 50,000

                                                                                          6 3,000,000 18 30,000

                                                                                          7 2,000,000 19 20,000

                                                                                          8 1,500,000 20 15,000

                                                                                          9 1,000,000 21 10,000

                                                                                          10 750,000 22 7,000

                                                                                          11 500,000 23 4,000

                                                                                          12 300,000 24 2,000

                                                                                                           25 1,000

NOTE: These amounts are assumed to be in MONs, a currency not yet

standardized and so open to final valuation; additionally, said sums are to be

multiplied by the Originator Recognition Percentage that is assigned for each

creator [originator], and so the greatest possible award is 22,500,000 MON

[25,000,000 X 90% = 22,500,000].

II.L.1.11 Except for required duty on Grand Juries and Three-Judge-Courts [and to accept ultimate “expulsion” in lieu of some fine or public duty or temporary (up to years) travel-restricted/monitored living-environment], and the secrecy disclosure duty, and own ID disclosure duty.

II.L.1.12 Except for tests of ID [pictures & tissue samples], and tests of education for those under age twelve [12] who wish to vote.

II.L.2.0 Pollution Regulation:

In accordance with “Non-interference Doctrine Exception Category” number four, and since the purity of one’s living environment is the base element in the preservation of life and of all other rights, NO one may place into the environment anything or any degree of concentration of said thing, that is not natural to that local environment;


A. it is provably harmless, or so contained and located that it does not affect any other creature [example: electronic noise held in by house walls; chemicals changed to all naturally occurring forms, and with concentrations similarly diluted; chemicals containerized and stored in the responsible parties’ own living or working property; etc.];


B. a “finding is registered by a Bureau of Environmental Protection stating that there is a scientific probability [50+% possibility] that the pollutant in question does no long-term damage to man, or to other central-nervous-systemed animals, of a deadly or crippling or incapacitating nature, and a “disruption fee” is paid in accordance with “Non-interference Doctrine Exception Category” number four;

OR ELSE, C. it is to be stopped and requisite clean-up ordered and penalty fees levied.

Disruption fees” [and penalty fees] are to be determined as follows [or in similar form]:

a. Classes of disruption [noise, CO₂, SO₂, sludge, etc.] are to be identified and registered by vote;

b. Measurement categories [decibels per distance, grams per volume, pH per concentration, particles per billion, etc.] are to be established and registered by vote for all of the classes of disruption;

c. A base unit number [100 decibels at 75 feet, 5 grams per 10 liters, 3 particles per 100 billion, etc.] is to be set by vote for each category of each class, and is to be used as a yardstick and a multiple for determining the degree of violation involved in each offense;

. A fee amount per time duration that the violation continued is to be set by vote for each base unit number of a violation; thus: if €10 for every 30 minutes that each base unit of some violation continues, then if a violation is measured as having amounted to five base unit numbers and it continued for two hours, then on this “€10 for 30 minutes” scale there would result a disruption fee [fine] of 10 x 4 [30 minutes x 4=2 hours] for €40 for each base unit number of violation and then that x 5, because there were five base unit numbers of violation, and so giving a total fine of €200;

d. Once an amount is set for ., then at every voting occasion thereafter the amount will be increased or decreased in proportion to the degree of vote upon each fee amount per time duration [for each base unit of disruption]; so if the fee amount was 10 for every 30 minutes on a given item and it received 60% vote approval vs. 40% vote disapproval, then because that is 1.5 to 1 ratio of approval, the fee [fine] will automatically be increased by 1.5 to 15 [in similar manner, it could decline]; and,

e. All voting is to be public – publicly recorded and published [rarely by secret ballot except occasionally as “check” votes; and, of course, “public” does not mean that one cannot have privacy while voting (indeed, it is an operational necessity), but only that both one’s immediate voting action is publicly shown on a local total or other board as soon as one has completed his voting, and that a later list is publicly posted also giving everyone’s vote]; and, where there are more than two items amongst which to be chosen, proportional vote determination shall be used: thus, if a vote is called on a new number of minutes – to be filled in on the ballot – to be used for the time duration, then if 200 people vote for 50 minutes and 400 people vote for 40 minutes and another 400 people vote for 30 minutes then [200 x 50] + [400 x 40] + [400 x30] equals 38,000 minutes to be divided by 1,000 people voting, and giving a proportional vote result of 38 minutes.


II.X.0.0 Regarding the “Non-interference Doctrine”, the twelve [12] so-called “exceptions” are not real dilutions of this right to be free from all physical interference, but are actually the practical defenses and implementations of this right whereby these twelve [12] “exceptions” provide the coordination needed to keep one person’s right to do as he pleases from interfering with another person trying to do a related thing at the same time and in the same space – that is to say, these twelve [12] rules deal with people’s acts of projection out of their own local sphere [own body or own residence] into the public one, and they assure that no conflicts occur due to these projections [some people may feel that number eleven (11) – court duty – is a form of invasion into their local sphere, but they are free to refuse it and pay a fine instead (see CHAPTER VIII.L.8), and this fine can be interpreted as a legitimate “tax” that they pay to continue making use of a coordinated society].